Thursday, October 22, 2015

Get Involved: Voice your Opinion to the FAA for UAS UAV Drone Registration

The FAA has assembled a task force with the sole purpose of product registration for UAS in the US. Below are the questions they pose, and are looking for comments on their website. See the link at the bottom to take you there and register your comments. This is your opportunity to let your voice be heard as we march toward the new rules to be published next year in 2016. 

FAA - UAS REGISTRATION TASK FORCE QUESTIONS:

1. What methods are available for identifying individual products? Does every UAS sold have an individual serial number? Is there another method for identifying individual products sold without serial numbers or those built from kits?
2. At what point should registration occur (e.g. point-of-sale or prior-to-operation)? How should transfers of ownership be addressed in registration?
3. If registration occurs at point-of-sale, who should be responsible for submission of the data? What burdens would be placed on vendors of UAS if DOT required registration to occur at point-of-sale? What are the advantages of a point-of-sale approach relative to a prior-to-operation approach?
4. Consistent with past practice of discretion, should certain UAS be excluded from registration based on performance capabilities or other characteristics that could be associated with safety risk, such as weight, speed, altitude operating limitations, duration of flight? If so, please submit information or data to help support the suggestions, and whether any other criteria should be considered.
5. How should a registration process be designed to minimize burdens and best protect innovation and encourage growth in the UAS industry?
6. Should the registration be electronic or web-based? Are there existing tools that could support an electronic registration process?
7. What type of information should be collected during the registration process to positively identify the aircraft owner and aircraft?
8. How should the registration data be stored? Who should have access to the registration data? How should the data be used?
9. Should a registration fee be collected and if so, how will the registration fee be collected if registration occurs at point-of-sale? Are there payment services that can be leveraged to assist (e.g.PayPal)?
10. Are there additional means beyond aircraft registration to encourage accountability and responsible use of UAS?
Comments received by November 6, 2015 would be most helpful in assisting the UAS registration task force in developing its recommendations. The comment period will remain open after this period and the Department will consider the comments received, in addition to the UAS registration task force's recommendations, in developing a stream-lined registration process for small UAS, including model aircraft.


Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Has the FAA Delivered a Death Blow to SkyPan International and their Drone (UAV, UAS) company?

For those of you flying illegally, take notice. The FAA has not fired a warning shot across the bow for violations of regulations, they have dropped an Atomic Bomb. 


Press Release – FAA Proposes $1.9 Million Civil Penalty Against SkyPan International for Allegedly Unauthorized Unmanned Aircraft Operations


"The FAA alleges that the company conducted 65 unauthorized commercial UAS flights over various locations in New York City and Chicago between March 21, 2012 and Dec. 15, 2014.  The flights involved aerial photography.  Of those, 43 flew in the highly restricted New York Class B airspace."

What is really interesting here is that Skypan received their FAA 333 Exemption April 17th, 2015, after all these alleged violations occurred. (the FAA 333 exemption provides a set of rules to follow for legal operation of drones, uav, uas in the national airspace) I've always heard ignorance of the law is no excuse, this is a great example of that. After the dust clears with all of the upcoming legal battles, will Skypan even have the resources to continue? Looking at the Subpoena from the FAA, the contracts were quite lucrative, but hardly enough to cover $1.9M


Subopena


Macklowe Properties contracted SkyPan for the photo shoots, yielding some impressive photos.